Aristotle on Deliberation: Its Place in Ethics, Politics and Rhetoric
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Standard
Aristotle on Deliberation : Its Place in Ethics, Politics and Rhetoric. / Kock, Christian Erik J.
Let’s talk politics : New essays on deliberative rhetoric. ed. / Hilde Van Belle; Kris Rutten; Paul Gillaerts; Dorien Van de Mieroop; Baldwin Van Gorp. Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2014. p. 13-25.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Aristotle on Deliberation
T2 - Its Place in Ethics, Politics and Rhetoric
AU - Kock, Christian Erik J
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Aristotle differs from most later philosophers in distinguishing clearly between epistemic reasoning, which aims for truth, and practical reasoning, which does not. How can he posit this distinction and yet not dismiss practical reasoning as flattery and manipulation, as Plato did? The answer lies in the concepts of deliberation (boulē, bouleusis) and deliberate choice (proairesis). They link Aristotle's rhetoric, ethics, and politics together and help provide definitions of all three: Ethics is about deliberate choices by individuals. Politics and rhetoric are about the collective deliberate choices by the polity: politics is about making these choices well so that the good life of all citizens is optimally secured; rhetoric is the principal means to do this. These links have not been much discussed by scholars, probably because few studies range across these three Aristotelian ‘arts’; a proper discussion of them should draw on modern work in ethics, political science, and rhetoric. These key concepts and Aristotle’s discussions of them offer inspiration for modern theories of ‘deliberative democracy,’ citizenship, argumentation, debate, and the public sphere. The paper belongs within the conference theme of “Rhetoric in political discourse.”
AB - Aristotle differs from most later philosophers in distinguishing clearly between epistemic reasoning, which aims for truth, and practical reasoning, which does not. How can he posit this distinction and yet not dismiss practical reasoning as flattery and manipulation, as Plato did? The answer lies in the concepts of deliberation (boulē, bouleusis) and deliberate choice (proairesis). They link Aristotle's rhetoric, ethics, and politics together and help provide definitions of all three: Ethics is about deliberate choices by individuals. Politics and rhetoric are about the collective deliberate choices by the polity: politics is about making these choices well so that the good life of all citizens is optimally secured; rhetoric is the principal means to do this. These links have not been much discussed by scholars, probably because few studies range across these three Aristotelian ‘arts’; a proper discussion of them should draw on modern work in ethics, political science, and rhetoric. These key concepts and Aristotle’s discussions of them offer inspiration for modern theories of ‘deliberative democracy,’ citizenship, argumentation, debate, and the public sphere. The paper belongs within the conference theme of “Rhetoric in political discourse.”
M3 - Book chapter
SN - 9789027211231
SP - 13
EP - 25
BT - Let’s talk politics
A2 - Van Belle, Hilde
A2 - Rutten, Kris
A2 - Gillaerts, Paul
A2 - Van de Mieroop, Dorien
A2 - Van Gorp, Baldwin
PB - John Benjamins Publishing Company
CY - Amsterdam
ER -
ID: 45966596