Procedural reasonableness and the normativity of argumentation: pragma-dialectical responses to epistemologist objections

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Procedural reasonableness and the normativity of argumentation: pragma-dialectical responses to epistemologist objections. / Lo Presti, Patrizio Ulf Enrico.

In: Cogency. Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2012, p. 53.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Lo Presti, PUE 2012, 'Procedural reasonableness and the normativity of argumentation: pragma-dialectical responses to epistemologist objections', Cogency. Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 53.

APA

Lo Presti, P. U. E. (2012). Procedural reasonableness and the normativity of argumentation: pragma-dialectical responses to epistemologist objections. Cogency. Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation, 4(1), 53.

Vancouver

Lo Presti PUE. Procedural reasonableness and the normativity of argumentation: pragma-dialectical responses to epistemologist objections. Cogency. Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation. 2012;4(1):53.

Author

Lo Presti, Patrizio Ulf Enrico. / Procedural reasonableness and the normativity of argumentation: pragma-dialectical responses to epistemologist objections. In: Cogency. Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation. 2012 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 53.

Bibtex

@article{534520d0ba424f61ae9ddbb4228f5733,
title = "Procedural reasonableness and the normativity of argumentation: pragma-dialectical responses to epistemologist objections",
abstract = "Pragma-dialectical argumentation theory has received criticism from epistemological argumentation theorists. While the former emphasizes argumentation as aimed at resolving differences of opinion through adequate procedures, the latter emphasizes that argumentation is aimed at reaching a justified conclusion of the argumentation. In this paper pragma-dialectics is analyzed and two objections considered. The first objection pertains to the pragma-dialectical definition of reasonable argumentation, the other to the lack of an account of normativity of argumentation in pragma-dialectics. It is argued that the objections are not convincing.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Epistemology, normativity, pragma-dialectics, reasonableness",
author = "{Lo Presti}, {Patrizio Ulf Enrico}",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "53",
journal = "Cogency",
issn = "0718-8285",
publisher = "Diego Portales University, Chile",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Procedural reasonableness and the normativity of argumentation: pragma-dialectical responses to epistemologist objections

AU - Lo Presti, Patrizio Ulf Enrico

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Pragma-dialectical argumentation theory has received criticism from epistemological argumentation theorists. While the former emphasizes argumentation as aimed at resolving differences of opinion through adequate procedures, the latter emphasizes that argumentation is aimed at reaching a justified conclusion of the argumentation. In this paper pragma-dialectics is analyzed and two objections considered. The first objection pertains to the pragma-dialectical definition of reasonable argumentation, the other to the lack of an account of normativity of argumentation in pragma-dialectics. It is argued that the objections are not convincing.

AB - Pragma-dialectical argumentation theory has received criticism from epistemological argumentation theorists. While the former emphasizes argumentation as aimed at resolving differences of opinion through adequate procedures, the latter emphasizes that argumentation is aimed at reaching a justified conclusion of the argumentation. In this paper pragma-dialectics is analyzed and two objections considered. The first objection pertains to the pragma-dialectical definition of reasonable argumentation, the other to the lack of an account of normativity of argumentation in pragma-dialectics. It is argued that the objections are not convincing.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Epistemology

KW - normativity

KW - pragma-dialectics

KW - reasonableness

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

SP - 53

JO - Cogency

JF - Cogency

SN - 0718-8285

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 333390081