Speaking about the normativity of meaning

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Speaking about the normativity of meaning. / Lo Presti, Patrizio Ulf Enrico.

In: SATS - Northern European Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2017, p. 55.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Lo Presti, PUE 2017, 'Speaking about the normativity of meaning', SATS - Northern European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 55.

APA

Lo Presti, P. U. E. (2017). Speaking about the normativity of meaning. SATS - Northern European Journal of Philosophy, 18(1), 55.

Vancouver

Lo Presti PUE. Speaking about the normativity of meaning. SATS - Northern European Journal of Philosophy. 2017;18(1):55.

Author

Lo Presti, Patrizio Ulf Enrico. / Speaking about the normativity of meaning. In: SATS - Northern European Journal of Philosophy. 2017 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 55.

Bibtex

@article{9dba88dbf4834b9e9eea1df61cf4e1a0,
title = "Speaking about the normativity of meaning",
abstract = "Contemporary debate on the nature of meaning centres on whether meaning is normative. Agreement is widespread that meaning implies correctness, but disagreement on whether correctness is normative remains. Normativists argue that correctness implies obligations or permissions. Antinormativists disagree and hold that correctness is a descriptive term. This paper argues that, fundamentally, meaning presupposes norms, but not in the generic normativist sense: a vocabulary is recognisable as part of a language if and only if it is part of a practice of committing and entitling to ask for and provide reasons for what is said. To commit and entitle is not obliged or permitted. It is a presupposition for speaking about obligations andpermissions.",
author = "{Lo Presti}, {Patrizio Ulf Enrico}",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "55",
journal = "SATS - Northern European Journal of Philosophy",
issn = "1600-1974",
publisher = "De Gruyter",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Speaking about the normativity of meaning

AU - Lo Presti, Patrizio Ulf Enrico

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Contemporary debate on the nature of meaning centres on whether meaning is normative. Agreement is widespread that meaning implies correctness, but disagreement on whether correctness is normative remains. Normativists argue that correctness implies obligations or permissions. Antinormativists disagree and hold that correctness is a descriptive term. This paper argues that, fundamentally, meaning presupposes norms, but not in the generic normativist sense: a vocabulary is recognisable as part of a language if and only if it is part of a practice of committing and entitling to ask for and provide reasons for what is said. To commit and entitle is not obliged or permitted. It is a presupposition for speaking about obligations andpermissions.

AB - Contemporary debate on the nature of meaning centres on whether meaning is normative. Agreement is widespread that meaning implies correctness, but disagreement on whether correctness is normative remains. Normativists argue that correctness implies obligations or permissions. Antinormativists disagree and hold that correctness is a descriptive term. This paper argues that, fundamentally, meaning presupposes norms, but not in the generic normativist sense: a vocabulary is recognisable as part of a language if and only if it is part of a practice of committing and entitling to ask for and provide reasons for what is said. To commit and entitle is not obliged or permitted. It is a presupposition for speaking about obligations andpermissions.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 55

JO - SATS - Northern European Journal of Philosophy

JF - SATS - Northern European Journal of Philosophy

SN - 1600-1974

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 333304922