Virtue reversed: Principal argumentative vices in political debate
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review
Documents
- Virtue reversed_ Principal argumentative vices in political debat
Submitted manuscript, 278 KB, PDF document
Contributing to an understanding of the true virtues of argumentation, this paper
sketches and exemplifies a theoretically reasoned but simple typology of argumentative vices or ‘malpractices’ that are rampant in political debate in modern democracies. The typology reflects, in negative, a set of argumentative norms, thus making a bid for something that civic instruction might profitably teach students at all levels about deliberative democracy.
sketches and exemplifies a theoretically reasoned but simple typology of argumentative vices or ‘malpractices’ that are rampant in political debate in modern democracies. The typology reflects, in negative, a set of argumentative norms, thus making a bid for something that civic instruction might profitably teach students at all levels about deliberative democracy.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Virtues of Argumentation : Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, May 2013 |
Editors | Dima Mohammed, Marcin Lewiński |
Number of pages | 9 |
Place of Publication | Windsor |
Publisher | University of Windsor |
Publication date | 15 Jun 2014 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780920233665 |
Publication status | Published - 15 Jun 2014 |
Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk
No data available
ID: 132941871