The Information Concept of Nicholas Belkin revisited – some semeiotic Comments

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

The Information Concept of Nicholas Belkin revisited – some semeiotic Comments. / Thellefsen, Torkild Leo; Sørensen, Bent; Thellefsen, Martin.

In: Journal of Documentation, Vol. 70, No. 1, 2014, p. 74 - 92.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Thellefsen, TL, Sørensen, B & Thellefsen, M 2014, 'The Information Concept of Nicholas Belkin revisited – some semeiotic Comments', Journal of Documentation, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 74 - 92. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-08-2012-0101

APA

Thellefsen, T. L., Sørensen, B., & Thellefsen, M. (2014). The Information Concept of Nicholas Belkin revisited – some semeiotic Comments. Journal of Documentation, 70(1), 74 - 92. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-08-2012-0101

Vancouver

Thellefsen TL, Sørensen B, Thellefsen M. The Information Concept of Nicholas Belkin revisited – some semeiotic Comments. Journal of Documentation. 2014;70(1):74 - 92. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-08-2012-0101

Author

Thellefsen, Torkild Leo ; Sørensen, Bent ; Thellefsen, Martin. / The Information Concept of Nicholas Belkin revisited – some semeiotic Comments. In: Journal of Documentation. 2014 ; Vol. 70, No. 1. pp. 74 - 92.

Bibtex

@article{3fb2d5ad0cf342f8bd5a6863f472b896,
title = "The Information Concept of Nicholas Belkin revisited – some semeiotic Comments",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to examine and compare Nicholas Belkin{\textquoteright}s information concept and his concept of communication with the authors{\textquoteright} semeiotic inspired communication model – the Dynacom.Design/methodology/approach – The authors compare the two communication models by comparing the requirements given by Belkin and the conditions of the Dynacom.Findings – The authors conclude that Belkin{\textquoteright}s idea of information and his idea of communication lack the social aspect. Based on his theory, he is unable to point out how information becomes knowledge. These are two major issues the authors believe they can elaborate on by introducing the Dynacom and their semeiotic inspired concept of information.Originality/value – No one has previously specifically analyzed Nicholas Belkin{\textquoteright}s concept of information and compared it to a semeiotic ditto.Keywords Communication, Information, Cognitive viewpoint, Nicholas Belkin, C.S. Peirce, Pheno-semeioticPaper type Research paper ",
author = "Thellefsen, {Torkild Leo} and Bent S{\o}rensen and Martin Thellefsen",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1108/JD-08-2012-0101",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "74 -- 92",
journal = "Journal of Documentation",
issn = "0022-0418",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Information Concept of Nicholas Belkin revisited – some semeiotic Comments

AU - Thellefsen, Torkild Leo

AU - Sørensen, Bent

AU - Thellefsen, Martin

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to examine and compare Nicholas Belkin’s information concept and his concept of communication with the authors’ semeiotic inspired communication model – the Dynacom.Design/methodology/approach – The authors compare the two communication models by comparing the requirements given by Belkin and the conditions of the Dynacom.Findings – The authors conclude that Belkin’s idea of information and his idea of communication lack the social aspect. Based on his theory, he is unable to point out how information becomes knowledge. These are two major issues the authors believe they can elaborate on by introducing the Dynacom and their semeiotic inspired concept of information.Originality/value – No one has previously specifically analyzed Nicholas Belkin’s concept of information and compared it to a semeiotic ditto.Keywords Communication, Information, Cognitive viewpoint, Nicholas Belkin, C.S. Peirce, Pheno-semeioticPaper type Research paper

AB - Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to examine and compare Nicholas Belkin’s information concept and his concept of communication with the authors’ semeiotic inspired communication model – the Dynacom.Design/methodology/approach – The authors compare the two communication models by comparing the requirements given by Belkin and the conditions of the Dynacom.Findings – The authors conclude that Belkin’s idea of information and his idea of communication lack the social aspect. Based on his theory, he is unable to point out how information becomes knowledge. These are two major issues the authors believe they can elaborate on by introducing the Dynacom and their semeiotic inspired concept of information.Originality/value – No one has previously specifically analyzed Nicholas Belkin’s concept of information and compared it to a semeiotic ditto.Keywords Communication, Information, Cognitive viewpoint, Nicholas Belkin, C.S. Peirce, Pheno-semeioticPaper type Research paper

U2 - 10.1108/JD-08-2012-0101

DO - 10.1108/JD-08-2012-0101

M3 - Journal article

VL - 70

SP - 74

EP - 92

JO - Journal of Documentation

JF - Journal of Documentation

SN - 0022-0418

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 47043861