The foundation of the concept of relevance

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The foundation of the concept of relevance. / Hjørland, Birger.

In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 61, No. 2, 2010, p. 217-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hjørland, B 2010, 'The foundation of the concept of relevance', Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 217-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21261

APA

Hjørland, B. (2010). The foundation of the concept of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 217-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21261

Vancouver

Hjørland B. The foundation of the concept of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2010;61(2):217-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21261

Author

Hjørland, Birger. / The foundation of the concept of relevance. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2010 ; Vol. 61, No. 2. pp. 217-237.

Bibtex

@article{57e4cc820a8e492182d7c7f48474596a,
title = "The foundation of the concept of relevance",
abstract = "In 1975 Tefko Saracevic declared “the subject knowledge view” to be the most fundamental perspective of relevance. This paper examines the assumptions in different views of relevance, including “the system's view” and “the user's view” and offers a reinterpretation of these views. The paper finds that what was regarded as the most fundamental view by Saracevic in 1975 has not since been considered (with very few exceptions). Other views, which are based on less fruitful assumptions, have dominated the discourse on relevance in information retrieval and information science. Many authors have reexamined the concept of relevance in information science, but have neglected the subject knowledge view, hence basic theoretical assumptions seem not to have been properly addressed. It is as urgent now as it was in 1975 seriously to consider “the subject knowledge view” of relevance (which may also be termed “the epistemological view”). The concept of relevance, like other basic concepts, is influenced by overall approaches to information science, such as the cognitive view and the domain-analytic view. There is today a trend toward a social paradigm for information science. This paper offers an understanding of relevance from such a social point of view. ",
author = "Birger Hj{\o}rland",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1002/asi.21261",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "217--237",
journal = "American Society for Information Science and Technology. Journal",
issn = "2330-1635",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The foundation of the concept of relevance

AU - Hjørland, Birger

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - In 1975 Tefko Saracevic declared “the subject knowledge view” to be the most fundamental perspective of relevance. This paper examines the assumptions in different views of relevance, including “the system's view” and “the user's view” and offers a reinterpretation of these views. The paper finds that what was regarded as the most fundamental view by Saracevic in 1975 has not since been considered (with very few exceptions). Other views, which are based on less fruitful assumptions, have dominated the discourse on relevance in information retrieval and information science. Many authors have reexamined the concept of relevance in information science, but have neglected the subject knowledge view, hence basic theoretical assumptions seem not to have been properly addressed. It is as urgent now as it was in 1975 seriously to consider “the subject knowledge view” of relevance (which may also be termed “the epistemological view”). The concept of relevance, like other basic concepts, is influenced by overall approaches to information science, such as the cognitive view and the domain-analytic view. There is today a trend toward a social paradigm for information science. This paper offers an understanding of relevance from such a social point of view.

AB - In 1975 Tefko Saracevic declared “the subject knowledge view” to be the most fundamental perspective of relevance. This paper examines the assumptions in different views of relevance, including “the system's view” and “the user's view” and offers a reinterpretation of these views. The paper finds that what was regarded as the most fundamental view by Saracevic in 1975 has not since been considered (with very few exceptions). Other views, which are based on less fruitful assumptions, have dominated the discourse on relevance in information retrieval and information science. Many authors have reexamined the concept of relevance in information science, but have neglected the subject knowledge view, hence basic theoretical assumptions seem not to have been properly addressed. It is as urgent now as it was in 1975 seriously to consider “the subject knowledge view” of relevance (which may also be termed “the epistemological view”). The concept of relevance, like other basic concepts, is influenced by overall approaches to information science, such as the cognitive view and the domain-analytic view. There is today a trend toward a social paradigm for information science. This paper offers an understanding of relevance from such a social point of view.

U2 - 10.1002/asi.21261

DO - 10.1002/asi.21261

M3 - Journal article

VL - 61

SP - 217

EP - 237

JO - American Society for Information Science and Technology. Journal

JF - American Society for Information Science and Technology. Journal

SN - 2330-1635

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 47044575