Sense of agency for movements

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Standard

Sense of agency for movements. / Christensen, Mark Schram; Grünbaum, Thor.

In: Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 65, 2018, p. 27-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Christensen, MS & Grünbaum, T 2018, 'Sense of agency for movements', Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 65, pp. 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.002

APA

Christensen, M. S., & Grünbaum, T. (2018). Sense of agency for movements. Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.002

Vancouver

Christensen MS, Grünbaum T. Sense of agency for movements. Consciousness and Cognition. 2018;65:27-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.002

Author

Christensen, Mark Schram ; Grünbaum, Thor. / Sense of agency for movements. In: Consciousness and Cognition. 2018 ; Vol. 65. pp. 27-47.

Bibtex

@article{1d71b78db83a487a9ed3728ba7b125f3,
title = "Sense of agency for movements",
abstract = "In this paper, we argue that the comparator model is not a satisfactory model of sense of agency (SoA). We present a theoretical argument and experimental studies. We show (1) most studies of SoA neglect a distinction between SoA associated with movements (narrow SoA) and SoA associated with environmental events (broad SoA); (2) the comparator model emerges from experimental studies of sensory consequences narrowly associated with movements; (3) narrow SoA can be explained by a comparator model, but a motor signal model is simpler and explain narrow SoA equally well; and (4) standard experimental paradigms study only broad SoA. Finally, we present results from two experiments, where we have failed to induce illusory narrow SoA in healthy participants. We believe our experimental approaches should have led to illusory SoA, if the comparator model of SoA was correct. The results challenge proponents of the comparator model of narrow SoA.",
author = "Christensen, {Mark Schram} and Thor Gr{\"u}nbaum",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.002",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "27--47",
journal = "Consciousness and Cognition",
issn = "1053-8100",
publisher = "Academic Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sense of agency for movements

AU - Christensen, Mark Schram

AU - Grünbaum, Thor

N1 - Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In this paper, we argue that the comparator model is not a satisfactory model of sense of agency (SoA). We present a theoretical argument and experimental studies. We show (1) most studies of SoA neglect a distinction between SoA associated with movements (narrow SoA) and SoA associated with environmental events (broad SoA); (2) the comparator model emerges from experimental studies of sensory consequences narrowly associated with movements; (3) narrow SoA can be explained by a comparator model, but a motor signal model is simpler and explain narrow SoA equally well; and (4) standard experimental paradigms study only broad SoA. Finally, we present results from two experiments, where we have failed to induce illusory narrow SoA in healthy participants. We believe our experimental approaches should have led to illusory SoA, if the comparator model of SoA was correct. The results challenge proponents of the comparator model of narrow SoA.

AB - In this paper, we argue that the comparator model is not a satisfactory model of sense of agency (SoA). We present a theoretical argument and experimental studies. We show (1) most studies of SoA neglect a distinction between SoA associated with movements (narrow SoA) and SoA associated with environmental events (broad SoA); (2) the comparator model emerges from experimental studies of sensory consequences narrowly associated with movements; (3) narrow SoA can be explained by a comparator model, but a motor signal model is simpler and explain narrow SoA equally well; and (4) standard experimental paradigms study only broad SoA. Finally, we present results from two experiments, where we have failed to induce illusory narrow SoA in healthy participants. We believe our experimental approaches should have led to illusory SoA, if the comparator model of SoA was correct. The results challenge proponents of the comparator model of narrow SoA.

U2 - 10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.002

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30007133

VL - 65

SP - 27

EP - 47

JO - Consciousness and Cognition

JF - Consciousness and Cognition

SN - 1053-8100

ER -

ID: 199589251