Science, Part I: Basic Conceptions of Science and the Scientific Method

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Science, Part I: Basic Conceptions of Science and the Scientific Method. / Hjørland, Birger.

In: Knowledge Organization, Vol. 48, No. 7-8, 06.05.2021, p. 473-498.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hjørland, B 2021, 'Science, Part I: Basic Conceptions of Science and the Scientific Method', Knowledge Organization, vol. 48, no. 7-8, pp. 473-498. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-7-8-473

APA

Hjørland, B. (2021). Science, Part I: Basic Conceptions of Science and the Scientific Method. Knowledge Organization, 48(7-8), 473-498. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-7-8-473

Vancouver

Hjørland B. Science, Part I: Basic Conceptions of Science and the Scientific Method. Knowledge Organization. 2021 May 6;48(7-8):473-498. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-7-8-473

Author

Hjørland, Birger. / Science, Part I: Basic Conceptions of Science and the Scientific Method. In: Knowledge Organization. 2021 ; Vol. 48, No. 7-8. pp. 473-498.

Bibtex

@article{2efda321a1d84fc6a500a29d6683b942,
title = "Science, Part I:: Basic Conceptions of Science and the Scientific Method",
abstract = "This article is the first in a trilogy about the concept “science”. Section 1 considers the historical development of the meaning of the term science and shows its close relation to the terms “knowledge” and “philosophy”. Section 2 presents four historic phases in the basic conceptualizations of science (1) science as representing absolute certain of knowledge based on deductive proof; (2) science as representing absolute certain of knowledge based on “the scientific method”; (3) science as representing fallible knowledge based on “the scientific method”; (4) science without a belief in “the scientific method” as constitutive, hence the question about the nature of science becomes dramatic. Section 3 presents four basic understandings of the scientific method: Rationalism, which gives priority to a priori thinking; empiricism, which gives priority to the collection, description, and processing of data in a neutral way; historicism, which gives priority to the interpretation of data in the light of “paradigm” and pragmatism, which emphasizes the analysis of the purposes, consequences, and the interests of knowledge. The second article in the trilogy focus on different fields studying science, while the final article presets further developments in the concept of science and the general conclusion. Overall, the trilogy illuminates the most important tensions in different conceptualizations of science and argues for the role of information science and knowledge organization in the study of science and suggests how “science” should be understood as an object of research in these fields.",
author = "Birger Hj{\o}rland",
year = "2021",
month = may,
day = "6",
doi = "10.5771/0943-7444-7-8-473",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "473--498",
journal = "Knowledge Organization",
issn = "0943-7444",
publisher = "Ergon-Verlag",
number = "7-8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Science, Part I:

T2 - Basic Conceptions of Science and the Scientific Method

AU - Hjørland, Birger

PY - 2021/5/6

Y1 - 2021/5/6

N2 - This article is the first in a trilogy about the concept “science”. Section 1 considers the historical development of the meaning of the term science and shows its close relation to the terms “knowledge” and “philosophy”. Section 2 presents four historic phases in the basic conceptualizations of science (1) science as representing absolute certain of knowledge based on deductive proof; (2) science as representing absolute certain of knowledge based on “the scientific method”; (3) science as representing fallible knowledge based on “the scientific method”; (4) science without a belief in “the scientific method” as constitutive, hence the question about the nature of science becomes dramatic. Section 3 presents four basic understandings of the scientific method: Rationalism, which gives priority to a priori thinking; empiricism, which gives priority to the collection, description, and processing of data in a neutral way; historicism, which gives priority to the interpretation of data in the light of “paradigm” and pragmatism, which emphasizes the analysis of the purposes, consequences, and the interests of knowledge. The second article in the trilogy focus on different fields studying science, while the final article presets further developments in the concept of science and the general conclusion. Overall, the trilogy illuminates the most important tensions in different conceptualizations of science and argues for the role of information science and knowledge organization in the study of science and suggests how “science” should be understood as an object of research in these fields.

AB - This article is the first in a trilogy about the concept “science”. Section 1 considers the historical development of the meaning of the term science and shows its close relation to the terms “knowledge” and “philosophy”. Section 2 presents four historic phases in the basic conceptualizations of science (1) science as representing absolute certain of knowledge based on deductive proof; (2) science as representing absolute certain of knowledge based on “the scientific method”; (3) science as representing fallible knowledge based on “the scientific method”; (4) science without a belief in “the scientific method” as constitutive, hence the question about the nature of science becomes dramatic. Section 3 presents four basic understandings of the scientific method: Rationalism, which gives priority to a priori thinking; empiricism, which gives priority to the collection, description, and processing of data in a neutral way; historicism, which gives priority to the interpretation of data in the light of “paradigm” and pragmatism, which emphasizes the analysis of the purposes, consequences, and the interests of knowledge. The second article in the trilogy focus on different fields studying science, while the final article presets further developments in the concept of science and the general conclusion. Overall, the trilogy illuminates the most important tensions in different conceptualizations of science and argues for the role of information science and knowledge organization in the study of science and suggests how “science” should be understood as an object of research in these fields.

U2 - 10.5771/0943-7444-7-8-473

DO - 10.5771/0943-7444-7-8-473

M3 - Journal article

VL - 48

SP - 473

EP - 498

JO - Knowledge Organization

JF - Knowledge Organization

SN - 0943-7444

IS - 7-8

ER -

ID: 259621776