Propaedeutics to Action: Vernacular Rhetorical Citizenship – Reflections on and of the Work of Gerard A. Hauser
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Standard
Propaedeutics to Action: Vernacular Rhetorical Citizenship – Reflections on and of the Work of Gerard A. Hauser. / Villadsen, Lisa Storm.
Gerard A. Hauser. Rhetorical Scholar of the Public Sphere. ed. / Ronald C. Arnett. Pittsburgh : Pennsylvania Communication Association, 2016. p. 47-63 (Pennsylvania Scholar Series; No. 8).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Propaedeutics to Action: Vernacular Rhetorical Citizenship – Reflections on and of the Work of Gerard A. Hauser
AU - Villadsen, Lisa Storm
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - In this chapter I focus on what I see as a tenor in Hauser’s work, namely rhetoric’s place in the basic schisms characteristic of democratic societies: how to bring together in responsible ways the sometimes conflicting appeals from reason and passion, and how to practice the rule of “the people” when in fact there are major power differences and often a perceived gap in interest, knowledge, and evaluation of issues between the majority and the elite minority. In Hauser’s own words, there are questions to be raised, “questions about the ways that participation is manifested, how opinion is expressed, how we may come to know it” (“Rhetorical Democracy and Civic Engagement” 7). In what follows, we shall track some of Hauser’s own answers to these questions.
AB - In this chapter I focus on what I see as a tenor in Hauser’s work, namely rhetoric’s place in the basic schisms characteristic of democratic societies: how to bring together in responsible ways the sometimes conflicting appeals from reason and passion, and how to practice the rule of “the people” when in fact there are major power differences and often a perceived gap in interest, knowledge, and evaluation of issues between the majority and the elite minority. In Hauser’s own words, there are questions to be raised, “questions about the ways that participation is manifested, how opinion is expressed, how we may come to know it” (“Rhetorical Democracy and Civic Engagement” 7). In what follows, we shall track some of Hauser’s own answers to these questions.
UR - http://pcasite.org/pca-journals/pca-scholar-series
M3 - Book chapter
T3 - Pennsylvania Scholar Series
SP - 47
EP - 63
BT - Gerard A. Hauser. Rhetorical Scholar of the Public Sphere
A2 - Arnett, Ronald C.
PB - Pennsylvania Communication Association
CY - Pittsburgh
ER -
ID: 165693074