Paradoxical autonomy in cultural organisations: An analysis of changing relations between cultural organisations and their institutional environment, with examples from libraries, archives and museums
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Paradoxical autonomy in cultural organisations : An analysis of changing relations between cultural organisations and their institutional environment, with examples from libraries, archives and museums. / Kann-Rasmussen, Nanna; Rasmussen, Casper Hvenegaard.
In: The International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2020, p. 636-649.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Paradoxical autonomy in cultural organisations
T2 - An analysis of changing relations between cultural organisations and their institutional environment, with examples from libraries, archives and museums
AU - Kann-Rasmussen, Nanna
AU - Rasmussen, Casper Hvenegaard
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This article analyses the changing relationships between cultural organisations and their institutional environment. Cultural policy research has traditionally focused on a decline in the autonomy of cultural organisations with Pierre Bourdieu’s theories as an overarching theoretical framework. However, recent studies of public administration tell another story. It shows how relationships between cultural organisations and their institutional environment are paradoxical. Cultural organisations have experienced a growing focus on societal value, users and performance indicators, which can be viewed as a decrease in their autonomy. Simultaneously, they have been able to pursue new ways of fulfilling their purpose, an increase in autonomy. The article discusses the theoretical perspectives on this paradox, with focus on New Public Governance, and shows that the paradox of autonomy entails a change in the roles of professionals, politicians and users. Politicians still determine subsidies, but they have increasingly left policymaking to the cultural organisations.
AB - This article analyses the changing relationships between cultural organisations and their institutional environment. Cultural policy research has traditionally focused on a decline in the autonomy of cultural organisations with Pierre Bourdieu’s theories as an overarching theoretical framework. However, recent studies of public administration tell another story. It shows how relationships between cultural organisations and their institutional environment are paradoxical. Cultural organisations have experienced a growing focus on societal value, users and performance indicators, which can be viewed as a decrease in their autonomy. Simultaneously, they have been able to pursue new ways of fulfilling their purpose, an increase in autonomy. The article discusses the theoretical perspectives on this paradox, with focus on New Public Governance, and shows that the paradox of autonomy entails a change in the roles of professionals, politicians and users. Politicians still determine subsidies, but they have increasingly left policymaking to the cultural organisations.
U2 - 10.1080/10286632.2020.1823976
DO - 10.1080/10286632.2020.1823976
M3 - Journal article
VL - 27
SP - 636
EP - 649
JO - International Journal of Cultural Policy
JF - International Journal of Cultural Policy
SN - 1028-6632
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 248337408