Paradoxical autonomy in cultural organisations: An analysis of changing relations between cultural organisations and their institutional environment, with examples from libraries, archives and museums

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Paradoxical autonomy in cultural organisations : An analysis of changing relations between cultural organisations and their institutional environment, with examples from libraries, archives and museums. / Kann-Rasmussen, Nanna; Rasmussen, Casper Hvenegaard.

In: The International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2020, p. 636-649.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Kann-Rasmussen, N & Rasmussen, CH 2020, 'Paradoxical autonomy in cultural organisations: An analysis of changing relations between cultural organisations and their institutional environment, with examples from libraries, archives and museums', The International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 636-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2020.1823976

APA

Kann-Rasmussen, N., & Rasmussen, C. H. (2020). Paradoxical autonomy in cultural organisations: An analysis of changing relations between cultural organisations and their institutional environment, with examples from libraries, archives and museums. The International Journal of Cultural Policy, 27(5), 636-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2020.1823976

Vancouver

Kann-Rasmussen N, Rasmussen CH. Paradoxical autonomy in cultural organisations: An analysis of changing relations between cultural organisations and their institutional environment, with examples from libraries, archives and museums. The International Journal of Cultural Policy. 2020;27(5):636-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2020.1823976

Author

Kann-Rasmussen, Nanna ; Rasmussen, Casper Hvenegaard. / Paradoxical autonomy in cultural organisations : An analysis of changing relations between cultural organisations and their institutional environment, with examples from libraries, archives and museums. In: The International Journal of Cultural Policy. 2020 ; Vol. 27, No. 5. pp. 636-649.

Bibtex

@article{5292a70486fd46248193bba7a70db04f,
title = "Paradoxical autonomy in cultural organisations: An analysis of changing relations between cultural organisations and their institutional environment, with examples from libraries, archives and museums",
abstract = "This article analyses the changing relationships between cultural organisations and their institutional environment. Cultural policy research has traditionally focused on a decline in the autonomy of cultural organisations with Pierre Bourdieu{\textquoteright}s theories as an overarching theoretical framework. However, recent studies of public administration tell another story. It shows how relationships between cultural organisations and their institutional environment are paradoxical. Cultural organisations have experienced a growing focus on societal value, users and performance indicators, which can be viewed as a decrease in their autonomy. Simultaneously, they have been able to pursue new ways of fulfilling their purpose, an increase in autonomy. The article discusses the theoretical perspectives on this paradox, with focus on New Public Governance, and shows that the paradox of autonomy entails a change in the roles of professionals, politicians and users. Politicians still determine subsidies, but they have increasingly left policymaking to the cultural organisations.",
author = "Nanna Kann-Rasmussen and Rasmussen, {Casper Hvenegaard}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1080/10286632.2020.1823976",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "636--649",
journal = "International Journal of Cultural Policy",
issn = "1028-6632",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paradoxical autonomy in cultural organisations

T2 - An analysis of changing relations between cultural organisations and their institutional environment, with examples from libraries, archives and museums

AU - Kann-Rasmussen, Nanna

AU - Rasmussen, Casper Hvenegaard

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - This article analyses the changing relationships between cultural organisations and their institutional environment. Cultural policy research has traditionally focused on a decline in the autonomy of cultural organisations with Pierre Bourdieu’s theories as an overarching theoretical framework. However, recent studies of public administration tell another story. It shows how relationships between cultural organisations and their institutional environment are paradoxical. Cultural organisations have experienced a growing focus on societal value, users and performance indicators, which can be viewed as a decrease in their autonomy. Simultaneously, they have been able to pursue new ways of fulfilling their purpose, an increase in autonomy. The article discusses the theoretical perspectives on this paradox, with focus on New Public Governance, and shows that the paradox of autonomy entails a change in the roles of professionals, politicians and users. Politicians still determine subsidies, but they have increasingly left policymaking to the cultural organisations.

AB - This article analyses the changing relationships between cultural organisations and their institutional environment. Cultural policy research has traditionally focused on a decline in the autonomy of cultural organisations with Pierre Bourdieu’s theories as an overarching theoretical framework. However, recent studies of public administration tell another story. It shows how relationships between cultural organisations and their institutional environment are paradoxical. Cultural organisations have experienced a growing focus on societal value, users and performance indicators, which can be viewed as a decrease in their autonomy. Simultaneously, they have been able to pursue new ways of fulfilling their purpose, an increase in autonomy. The article discusses the theoretical perspectives on this paradox, with focus on New Public Governance, and shows that the paradox of autonomy entails a change in the roles of professionals, politicians and users. Politicians still determine subsidies, but they have increasingly left policymaking to the cultural organisations.

U2 - 10.1080/10286632.2020.1823976

DO - 10.1080/10286632.2020.1823976

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27

SP - 636

EP - 649

JO - International Journal of Cultural Policy

JF - International Journal of Cultural Policy

SN - 1028-6632

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 248337408