Fighting status inequalities: non-domination vs non-interference

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Fighting status inequalities : non-domination vs non-interference. / Nielsen, Morten Ebbe Juul; Landes, Xavier.

In: Public Health Ethics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2016, p. 155-163.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Nielsen, MEJ & Landes, X 2016, 'Fighting status inequalities: non-domination vs non-interference', Public Health Ethics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phv029

APA

Nielsen, M. E. J., & Landes, X. (2016). Fighting status inequalities: non-domination vs non-interference. Public Health Ethics, 9(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phv029

Vancouver

Nielsen MEJ, Landes X. Fighting status inequalities: non-domination vs non-interference. Public Health Ethics. 2016;9(2):155-163. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phv029

Author

Nielsen, Morten Ebbe Juul ; Landes, Xavier. / Fighting status inequalities : non-domination vs non-interference. In: Public Health Ethics. 2016 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 155-163.

Bibtex

@article{96a5f8cc2dfc4b4b83b618a63ec0c81d,
title = "Fighting status inequalities: non-domination vs non-interference",
abstract = "Status inequalities seem to play a fairly big role in creating inequalities in health. This article assumes that there can be good reasons to fight status inequalities in order to reduce inequalities in health. It examines whether the neorepublican ideal of non-dominance does a better job as a theoretical foil for this as compared to a liberal notion of non-interference. The article concludes that there is a prima facie case for incorporating non-dominance into our thinking about public health, but that it needs to go hand in hand with a more traditional liberal ideal of non-interference.",
author = "Nielsen, {Morten Ebbe Juul} and Xavier Landes",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1093/phe/phv029",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "155--163",
journal = "Public Health Ethics",
issn = "1754-9973",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fighting status inequalities

T2 - non-domination vs non-interference

AU - Nielsen, Morten Ebbe Juul

AU - Landes, Xavier

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Status inequalities seem to play a fairly big role in creating inequalities in health. This article assumes that there can be good reasons to fight status inequalities in order to reduce inequalities in health. It examines whether the neorepublican ideal of non-dominance does a better job as a theoretical foil for this as compared to a liberal notion of non-interference. The article concludes that there is a prima facie case for incorporating non-dominance into our thinking about public health, but that it needs to go hand in hand with a more traditional liberal ideal of non-interference.

AB - Status inequalities seem to play a fairly big role in creating inequalities in health. This article assumes that there can be good reasons to fight status inequalities in order to reduce inequalities in health. It examines whether the neorepublican ideal of non-dominance does a better job as a theoretical foil for this as compared to a liberal notion of non-interference. The article concludes that there is a prima facie case for incorporating non-dominance into our thinking about public health, but that it needs to go hand in hand with a more traditional liberal ideal of non-interference.

U2 - 10.1093/phe/phv029

DO - 10.1093/phe/phv029

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27551298

VL - 9

SP - 155

EP - 163

JO - Public Health Ethics

JF - Public Health Ethics

SN - 1754-9973

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 146337294