Facet analysis: The logical approach to knowledge organization

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Facet analysis : The logical approach to knowledge organization. / Hjørland, Birger.

In: Information Processing & Management, 15.01.2013, p. 545-557.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hjørland, B 2013, 'Facet analysis: The logical approach to knowledge organization', Information Processing & Management, pp. 545-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2012.10.001

APA

Hjørland, B. (2013). Facet analysis: The logical approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing & Management, 545-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2012.10.001

Vancouver

Hjørland B. Facet analysis: The logical approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing & Management. 2013 Jan 15;545-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2012.10.001

Author

Hjørland, Birger. / Facet analysis : The logical approach to knowledge organization. In: Information Processing & Management. 2013 ; pp. 545-557.

Bibtex

@article{0900171360db41e7b65b0b29c45f4166,
title = "Facet analysis: The logical approach to knowledge organization",
abstract = "The facet-analytic paradigm is probably the most distinct approach to knowledge organization within Library and Information Science, and in many ways it has dominated what has be termed “modern classification theory”. It was mainly developed by S.R. Ranganathan and the British Classification Research Group, but it is mostly based on principles of logical division developed more than two millennia ago. Colon Classification (CC) and Bliss 2 (BC2) are among the most important systems developed on this theoretical basis, but it has also influenced the development of other systems, such as the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and is also applied in many websites. It still has a strong position in the field and it is the most explicit and “pure” theoretical approach to knowledge organization (KO) (but it is not by implication necessarily also the most important one). The strength of this approach is its logical principles and the way it provides structures in knowledge organization systems (KOS). The main weaknesses are (1) its lack of empirical basis and (2) its speculative ordering of knowledge without basis in the development or influence of theories and socio-historical studies. It seems to be based on the problematic assumption that relations between concepts are a priori and not established by the development of models, theories and laws.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Facet analysis; ",
author = "Birger Hj{\o}rland",
note = "This is one in a series of articles analyzing theoretical traditions in Knowledge Organization (or Information Organization)",
year = "2013",
month = jan,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.ipm.2012.10.001",
language = "English",
pages = "545--557",
journal = "Information Processing & Management",
issn = "0306-4573",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facet analysis

T2 - The logical approach to knowledge organization

AU - Hjørland, Birger

N1 - This is one in a series of articles analyzing theoretical traditions in Knowledge Organization (or Information Organization)

PY - 2013/1/15

Y1 - 2013/1/15

N2 - The facet-analytic paradigm is probably the most distinct approach to knowledge organization within Library and Information Science, and in many ways it has dominated what has be termed “modern classification theory”. It was mainly developed by S.R. Ranganathan and the British Classification Research Group, but it is mostly based on principles of logical division developed more than two millennia ago. Colon Classification (CC) and Bliss 2 (BC2) are among the most important systems developed on this theoretical basis, but it has also influenced the development of other systems, such as the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and is also applied in many websites. It still has a strong position in the field and it is the most explicit and “pure” theoretical approach to knowledge organization (KO) (but it is not by implication necessarily also the most important one). The strength of this approach is its logical principles and the way it provides structures in knowledge organization systems (KOS). The main weaknesses are (1) its lack of empirical basis and (2) its speculative ordering of knowledge without basis in the development or influence of theories and socio-historical studies. It seems to be based on the problematic assumption that relations between concepts are a priori and not established by the development of models, theories and laws.

AB - The facet-analytic paradigm is probably the most distinct approach to knowledge organization within Library and Information Science, and in many ways it has dominated what has be termed “modern classification theory”. It was mainly developed by S.R. Ranganathan and the British Classification Research Group, but it is mostly based on principles of logical division developed more than two millennia ago. Colon Classification (CC) and Bliss 2 (BC2) are among the most important systems developed on this theoretical basis, but it has also influenced the development of other systems, such as the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and is also applied in many websites. It still has a strong position in the field and it is the most explicit and “pure” theoretical approach to knowledge organization (KO) (but it is not by implication necessarily also the most important one). The strength of this approach is its logical principles and the way it provides structures in knowledge organization systems (KOS). The main weaknesses are (1) its lack of empirical basis and (2) its speculative ordering of knowledge without basis in the development or influence of theories and socio-historical studies. It seems to be based on the problematic assumption that relations between concepts are a priori and not established by the development of models, theories and laws.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Facet analysis;

U2 - 10.1016/j.ipm.2012.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ipm.2012.10.001

M3 - Journal article

SP - 545

EP - 557

JO - Information Processing & Management

JF - Information Processing & Management

SN - 0306-4573

ER -

ID: 47036293