Bibliographical control

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Bibliographical control. / Hjørland, Birger.

In: Knowledge Organization, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2023, p. 301-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hjørland, B 2023, 'Bibliographical control', Knowledge Organization, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 301-315. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2023-4-301

APA

Hjørland, B. (2023). Bibliographical control. Knowledge Organization, 50(4), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2023-4-301

Vancouver

Hjørland B. Bibliographical control. Knowledge Organization. 2023;50(4):301-315. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2023-4-301

Author

Hjørland, Birger. / Bibliographical control. In: Knowledge Organization. 2023 ; Vol. 50, No. 4. pp. 301-315.

Bibtex

@article{b856210ae86244bd82a1f27b5a203add,
title = "Bibliographical control",
abstract = "Section 1 of this article discusses the concept of bibliographical control and makes a distinction between this term, “bibliographical description,” and related terms, which are often confused in the literature. It further discusses the function of bibliographical control and criticizes Patrick Wilson{\textquoteright}s distinction between “exploitative control” and “descriptive control.” Section 2 presents projects for establishing bibliographic control from the Library of Alexandria to the Internet and Google, and it is found that these projects have often been dominated by a positivist dream to make all information in the world available to everybody. Section 3 discusses the theoretical problems of providing comprehensive coverage and retrieving documents represented in databases and argues that 100% coverage and retrievability is an unobtainable ideal. It is shown that bibliographical control has been taken very seriously in the field of medicine, where knowledge of the most important findings is of utmost importance. In principle, it is equally important in all other domains. The conclusion states that the alternative to a positivist dream of complete bibliographic control is a pragmatic philosophy aiming at optimizing bibliographic control supporting specific activities, perspectives, and interests. ",
author = "Birger Hj{\o}rland",
note = "To appear in Knowledge Organization. Now published online in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.5771/0943-7444-2023-4-301",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "301--315",
journal = "Knowledge Organization",
issn = "0943-7444",
publisher = "Ergon-Verlag",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bibliographical control

AU - Hjørland, Birger

N1 - To appear in Knowledge Organization. Now published online in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Section 1 of this article discusses the concept of bibliographical control and makes a distinction between this term, “bibliographical description,” and related terms, which are often confused in the literature. It further discusses the function of bibliographical control and criticizes Patrick Wilson’s distinction between “exploitative control” and “descriptive control.” Section 2 presents projects for establishing bibliographic control from the Library of Alexandria to the Internet and Google, and it is found that these projects have often been dominated by a positivist dream to make all information in the world available to everybody. Section 3 discusses the theoretical problems of providing comprehensive coverage and retrieving documents represented in databases and argues that 100% coverage and retrievability is an unobtainable ideal. It is shown that bibliographical control has been taken very seriously in the field of medicine, where knowledge of the most important findings is of utmost importance. In principle, it is equally important in all other domains. The conclusion states that the alternative to a positivist dream of complete bibliographic control is a pragmatic philosophy aiming at optimizing bibliographic control supporting specific activities, perspectives, and interests.

AB - Section 1 of this article discusses the concept of bibliographical control and makes a distinction between this term, “bibliographical description,” and related terms, which are often confused in the literature. It further discusses the function of bibliographical control and criticizes Patrick Wilson’s distinction between “exploitative control” and “descriptive control.” Section 2 presents projects for establishing bibliographic control from the Library of Alexandria to the Internet and Google, and it is found that these projects have often been dominated by a positivist dream to make all information in the world available to everybody. Section 3 discusses the theoretical problems of providing comprehensive coverage and retrieving documents represented in databases and argues that 100% coverage and retrievability is an unobtainable ideal. It is shown that bibliographical control has been taken very seriously in the field of medicine, where knowledge of the most important findings is of utmost importance. In principle, it is equally important in all other domains. The conclusion states that the alternative to a positivist dream of complete bibliographic control is a pragmatic philosophy aiming at optimizing bibliographic control supporting specific activities, perspectives, and interests.

U2 - 10.5771/0943-7444-2023-4-301

DO - 10.5771/0943-7444-2023-4-301

M3 - Journal article

VL - 50

SP - 301

EP - 315

JO - Knowledge Organization

JF - Knowledge Organization

SN - 0943-7444

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 340364226