The Problem of Probability: An Examination and Refutation of Hjørland’s Relevance Equation

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › Research › peer-review

Standard

The Problem of Probability: An Examination and Refutation of Hjørland’s Relevance Equation. / Nicolaisen, Jeppe.

In: Information Research, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Nicolaisen, J 2017, 'The Problem of Probability: An Examination and Refutation of Hjørland’s Relevance Equation', Information Research, vol. 22, no. 1. <http://www.informationr.net/ir/22-1/colis/colis1627.html>

APA

Nicolaisen, J. (2017). The Problem of Probability: An Examination and Refutation of Hjørland’s Relevance Equation. Information Research, 22(1). http://www.informationr.net/ir/22-1/colis/colis1627.html

Vancouver

Nicolaisen J. The Problem of Probability: An Examination and Refutation of Hjørland’s Relevance Equation. Information Research. 2017;22(1).

Author

Nicolaisen, Jeppe. / The Problem of Probability: An Examination and Refutation of Hjørland’s Relevance Equation. In: Information Research. 2017 ; Vol. 22, No. 1.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{eb22c16adaab4345b4089ffaa953a2d5,
title = "The Problem of Probability: An Examination and Refutation of Hj{\o}rland{\textquoteright}s Relevance Equation",
abstract = "Introduction. The paper presents a critical examination of Professor Birger Hj{\o}rland{\textquoteright}s relevance equation: Something (A) is relevant to a task (T) if it increases the likelihood of accomplishing the goal (G), which is implied by T. Method. Two theories of probability logic (the logical theory and the intersubjective theory) are briefly reviewed and then applied to Hj{\o}rland{\textquoteright}s equation. Analysis. Focusing on how these theories warrant the probability assumption makes it possible to detect deficiencies in Hj{\o}rland{\textquoteright}s equation, based as it is on probability logic. Results. Regardless of the kind of logic applied to warrant the probability assumption of Hj{\o}rland{\textquoteright}s equation, the outcome of using it to determine the relevance of any A to any T is found to have quite bizarre consequences: Either nothing is relevant or everything is relevant. Conclusion. Contrary to Hj{\o}rland{\textquoteright}s claim that his relevance equation applies to anything (including documents, ideas, meanings, texts, theories, and things), it is found at best to have very limited generalisability.",
author = "Jeppe Nicolaisen",
note = "Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science, Uppsala, Sweden, June 27-29, 2016",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
journal = "Information Research",
issn = "1368-1613",
publisher = "University of Sheffield Department of Information Studies",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - The Problem of Probability: An Examination and Refutation of Hjørland’s Relevance Equation

AU - Nicolaisen, Jeppe

N1 - Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science, Uppsala, Sweden, June 27-29, 2016

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Introduction. The paper presents a critical examination of Professor Birger Hjørland’s relevance equation: Something (A) is relevant to a task (T) if it increases the likelihood of accomplishing the goal (G), which is implied by T. Method. Two theories of probability logic (the logical theory and the intersubjective theory) are briefly reviewed and then applied to Hjørland’s equation. Analysis. Focusing on how these theories warrant the probability assumption makes it possible to detect deficiencies in Hjørland’s equation, based as it is on probability logic. Results. Regardless of the kind of logic applied to warrant the probability assumption of Hjørland’s equation, the outcome of using it to determine the relevance of any A to any T is found to have quite bizarre consequences: Either nothing is relevant or everything is relevant. Conclusion. Contrary to Hjørland’s claim that his relevance equation applies to anything (including documents, ideas, meanings, texts, theories, and things), it is found at best to have very limited generalisability.

AB - Introduction. The paper presents a critical examination of Professor Birger Hjørland’s relevance equation: Something (A) is relevant to a task (T) if it increases the likelihood of accomplishing the goal (G), which is implied by T. Method. Two theories of probability logic (the logical theory and the intersubjective theory) are briefly reviewed and then applied to Hjørland’s equation. Analysis. Focusing on how these theories warrant the probability assumption makes it possible to detect deficiencies in Hjørland’s equation, based as it is on probability logic. Results. Regardless of the kind of logic applied to warrant the probability assumption of Hjørland’s equation, the outcome of using it to determine the relevance of any A to any T is found to have quite bizarre consequences: Either nothing is relevant or everything is relevant. Conclusion. Contrary to Hjørland’s claim that his relevance equation applies to anything (including documents, ideas, meanings, texts, theories, and things), it is found at best to have very limited generalisability.

M3 - Conference article

VL - 22

JO - Information Research

JF - Information Research

SN - 1368-1613

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 174695500