Kunstbegrebets Koloniale Klassifikationer til Forhandling på Museer i Sydafrika

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Kunstbegrebets Koloniale Klassifikationer til Forhandling på Museer i Sydafrika. / Nielsen, Vibe.

In: Kulturstudier, Vol. 1, 2021, p. 89-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Nielsen, V 2021, 'Kunstbegrebets Koloniale Klassifikationer til Forhandling på Museer i Sydafrika', Kulturstudier, vol. 1, pp. 89-112. <https://tidsskrift.dk/fn/article/view/89-112/174016>

APA

Nielsen, V. (2021). Kunstbegrebets Koloniale Klassifikationer til Forhandling på Museer i Sydafrika. Kulturstudier, 1, 89-112. https://tidsskrift.dk/fn/article/view/89-112/174016

Vancouver

Nielsen V. Kunstbegrebets Koloniale Klassifikationer til Forhandling på Museer i Sydafrika. Kulturstudier. 2021;1:89-112.

Author

Nielsen, Vibe. / Kunstbegrebets Koloniale Klassifikationer til Forhandling på Museer i Sydafrika. In: Kulturstudier. 2021 ; Vol. 1. pp. 89-112.

Bibtex

@article{b5fef2f7a35340d48a416904dd52cd15,
title = "Kunstbegrebets Koloniale Klassifikationer til Forhandling p{\aa} Museer i Sydafrika",
abstract = "This article examines the consequences of expanding classificatory boundaries. Since the end of apartheid in 1994, objects formerly known as ethnographica are now largely found in art galleries and treated like objects of aesthetic rather than cultural historical value. I highlight how a number of contemporary South African curators reject this assumed valorisation that the objects supposedly gain when they are exhibited in the realm of the aesthetics. However, in arguing that contemporary South African artists are just as contemporary, experimental, conceptual and non-traditional as their counterparts from the Global North, the curators let go of an important part of the artistic history of Africa. If so-called traditional African objects are not to be displayed in art galleries, where then, is there room for art forms that are rooted in traditions from Africa before European contact? This article argues that colonial distinctions between art and artefact might be challenged, if curators and museum professionals start highlighting that all objects, no matter who made them, possess both aesthetic and cultural historical value. In this way museums might be able to look beyond colonial classificatory practices and let go of the hierarchy between objects that the material culture of Africa has endured during the past century.",
keywords = "Det Humanistiske Fakultet, Museums, Art, South Africa, Curating, Re-classification, Ethnographica, Colonialism, Post-apartheid",
author = "Vibe Nielsen",
year = "2021",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "1",
pages = "89--112",
journal = "Kulturstudier",
issn = "1904-5352",
publisher = "Dansk Historisk F{\ae}llesr{\aa}d & Foreningen Danmarks Folkeminder",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Kunstbegrebets Koloniale Klassifikationer til Forhandling på Museer i Sydafrika

AU - Nielsen, Vibe

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - This article examines the consequences of expanding classificatory boundaries. Since the end of apartheid in 1994, objects formerly known as ethnographica are now largely found in art galleries and treated like objects of aesthetic rather than cultural historical value. I highlight how a number of contemporary South African curators reject this assumed valorisation that the objects supposedly gain when they are exhibited in the realm of the aesthetics. However, in arguing that contemporary South African artists are just as contemporary, experimental, conceptual and non-traditional as their counterparts from the Global North, the curators let go of an important part of the artistic history of Africa. If so-called traditional African objects are not to be displayed in art galleries, where then, is there room for art forms that are rooted in traditions from Africa before European contact? This article argues that colonial distinctions between art and artefact might be challenged, if curators and museum professionals start highlighting that all objects, no matter who made them, possess both aesthetic and cultural historical value. In this way museums might be able to look beyond colonial classificatory practices and let go of the hierarchy between objects that the material culture of Africa has endured during the past century.

AB - This article examines the consequences of expanding classificatory boundaries. Since the end of apartheid in 1994, objects formerly known as ethnographica are now largely found in art galleries and treated like objects of aesthetic rather than cultural historical value. I highlight how a number of contemporary South African curators reject this assumed valorisation that the objects supposedly gain when they are exhibited in the realm of the aesthetics. However, in arguing that contemporary South African artists are just as contemporary, experimental, conceptual and non-traditional as their counterparts from the Global North, the curators let go of an important part of the artistic history of Africa. If so-called traditional African objects are not to be displayed in art galleries, where then, is there room for art forms that are rooted in traditions from Africa before European contact? This article argues that colonial distinctions between art and artefact might be challenged, if curators and museum professionals start highlighting that all objects, no matter who made them, possess both aesthetic and cultural historical value. In this way museums might be able to look beyond colonial classificatory practices and let go of the hierarchy between objects that the material culture of Africa has endured during the past century.

KW - Det Humanistiske Fakultet

KW - Museums

KW - Art

KW - South Africa

KW - Curating

KW - Re-classification

KW - Ethnographica

KW - Colonialism

KW - Post-apartheid

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 1

SP - 89

EP - 112

JO - Kulturstudier

JF - Kulturstudier

SN - 1904-5352

ER -

ID: 391166145