It’s Nothing but a Deepfake! The Effects of Misinformation and Deepfake Labels Delegitimizing an Authentic Political Speech

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

It’s Nothing but a Deepfake! The Effects of Misinformation and Deepfake Labels Delegitimizing an Authentic Political Speech. / Hameleers, Michael; Marquart, Franziska.

In: International Journal of Communication, Vol. 17, 2023, p. 6291-6311.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hameleers, M & Marquart, F 2023, 'It’s Nothing but a Deepfake! The Effects of Misinformation and Deepfake Labels Delegitimizing an Authentic Political Speech', International Journal of Communication, vol. 17, pp. 6291-6311.

APA

Hameleers, M., & Marquart, F. (2023). It’s Nothing but a Deepfake! The Effects of Misinformation and Deepfake Labels Delegitimizing an Authentic Political Speech. International Journal of Communication, 17, 6291-6311.

Vancouver

Hameleers M, Marquart F. It’s Nothing but a Deepfake! The Effects of Misinformation and Deepfake Labels Delegitimizing an Authentic Political Speech. International Journal of Communication. 2023;17:6291-6311.

Author

Hameleers, Michael ; Marquart, Franziska. / It’s Nothing but a Deepfake! The Effects of Misinformation and Deepfake Labels Delegitimizing an Authentic Political Speech. In: International Journal of Communication. 2023 ; Vol. 17. pp. 6291-6311.

Bibtex

@article{aa002d22b07f426d86e32dafcf1b171e,
title = "It{\textquoteright}s Nothing but a Deepfake! The Effects of Misinformation and Deepfake Labels Delegitimizing an Authentic Political Speech",
abstract = "Mis- and disinformation labels are increasingly weaponized and used as delegitimizing accusations targeted at mainstream media and political opponents. To better understand how such accusations can affect the credibility of real information and policy preferences, we conducted a two-wave panel experiment (Nwave2 = 788) to assess the longer-term effect of delegitimizing labels targeting an authentic video message. We find that exposure to an accusation of misinformation or disinformation lowered the perceived credibility of the video but did not affect policy preferences related to the content of the video. Furthermore, more extreme disinformation accusations were perceived as less credible than milder misinformation labels. The effects lasted over a period of three days and still occurred when there was a delay in the label attribution. These findings indicate that while mis- and disinformation labels might make authentic content less credible, they are themselves not always deemed credible and are less likely to change substantive policy preferences.",
keywords = "credibility, deepfakes, disinformation, fake news labels, misinformation",
author = "Michael Hameleers and Franziska Marquart",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 (Michael Hameleers and Franziska Marquart). Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd). Available at http://ijoc.org",
year = "2023",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "6291--6311",
journal = "International Journal of Communication",
issn = "1932-8036",
publisher = "USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - It’s Nothing but a Deepfake! The Effects of Misinformation and Deepfake Labels Delegitimizing an Authentic Political Speech

AU - Hameleers, Michael

AU - Marquart, Franziska

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 (Michael Hameleers and Franziska Marquart). Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd). Available at http://ijoc.org

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Mis- and disinformation labels are increasingly weaponized and used as delegitimizing accusations targeted at mainstream media and political opponents. To better understand how such accusations can affect the credibility of real information and policy preferences, we conducted a two-wave panel experiment (Nwave2 = 788) to assess the longer-term effect of delegitimizing labels targeting an authentic video message. We find that exposure to an accusation of misinformation or disinformation lowered the perceived credibility of the video but did not affect policy preferences related to the content of the video. Furthermore, more extreme disinformation accusations were perceived as less credible than milder misinformation labels. The effects lasted over a period of three days and still occurred when there was a delay in the label attribution. These findings indicate that while mis- and disinformation labels might make authentic content less credible, they are themselves not always deemed credible and are less likely to change substantive policy preferences.

AB - Mis- and disinformation labels are increasingly weaponized and used as delegitimizing accusations targeted at mainstream media and political opponents. To better understand how such accusations can affect the credibility of real information and policy preferences, we conducted a two-wave panel experiment (Nwave2 = 788) to assess the longer-term effect of delegitimizing labels targeting an authentic video message. We find that exposure to an accusation of misinformation or disinformation lowered the perceived credibility of the video but did not affect policy preferences related to the content of the video. Furthermore, more extreme disinformation accusations were perceived as less credible than milder misinformation labels. The effects lasted over a period of three days and still occurred when there was a delay in the label attribution. These findings indicate that while mis- and disinformation labels might make authentic content less credible, they are themselves not always deemed credible and are less likely to change substantive policy preferences.

KW - credibility

KW - deepfakes

KW - disinformation

KW - fake news labels

KW - misinformation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177182679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85177182679

VL - 17

SP - 6291

EP - 6311

JO - International Journal of Communication

JF - International Journal of Communication

SN - 1932-8036

ER -

ID: 396018336