Institutional Polymorphism: Diversification of Content and Monetization Strategies on YouTube

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Institutional Polymorphism : Diversification of Content and Monetization Strategies on YouTube. / Ørmen, Jacob; Gregersen, Andreas.

In: Television & New Media, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2023, p. 432-451.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Ørmen, J & Gregersen, A 2023, 'Institutional Polymorphism: Diversification of Content and Monetization Strategies on YouTube', Television & New Media, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 432-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764221110198

APA

Ørmen, J., & Gregersen, A. (2023). Institutional Polymorphism: Diversification of Content and Monetization Strategies on YouTube. Television & New Media, 24(4), 432-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764221110198

Vancouver

Ørmen J, Gregersen A. Institutional Polymorphism: Diversification of Content and Monetization Strategies on YouTube. Television & New Media. 2023;24(4):432-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764221110198

Author

Ørmen, Jacob ; Gregersen, Andreas. / Institutional Polymorphism : Diversification of Content and Monetization Strategies on YouTube. In: Television & New Media. 2023 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 432-451.

Bibtex

@article{96ee025de90d4d18873e4d7565e5df84,
title = "Institutional Polymorphism: Diversification of Content and Monetization Strategies on YouTube",
abstract = "Through guidelines, terms of service and algorithmic curation, digital platforms such as YouTube encourage creators to produce content that fits with the commercial goals of the platform. Scholars have argued that this pressure to conform might lead to uniformity, or isomorphism, in the ways organizations manage their presence on platforms. This article contributes to the debate on isomorphism by taking a bottom-up approach and ask to which extent creators on YouTube pursue similar, or different, strategies for uploading and monetizing content. Through quantitative and qualitative analyses of a sample of YouTube channels, we show how content creators adapt to, negotiate with, and defy institutional pressures. In the end, we find greater support for diversification, that is, polymorphism, than concentration in the ways organizations manage their presence on the platform. This has implications for how we understand platform power and integrate institutional theories in communication research.",
author = "Jacob {\O}rmen and Andreas Gregersen",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1177/15274764221110198",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "432--451",
journal = "Television and New Media",
issn = "1527-4764",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutional Polymorphism

T2 - Diversification of Content and Monetization Strategies on YouTube

AU - Ørmen, Jacob

AU - Gregersen, Andreas

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Through guidelines, terms of service and algorithmic curation, digital platforms such as YouTube encourage creators to produce content that fits with the commercial goals of the platform. Scholars have argued that this pressure to conform might lead to uniformity, or isomorphism, in the ways organizations manage their presence on platforms. This article contributes to the debate on isomorphism by taking a bottom-up approach and ask to which extent creators on YouTube pursue similar, or different, strategies for uploading and monetizing content. Through quantitative and qualitative analyses of a sample of YouTube channels, we show how content creators adapt to, negotiate with, and defy institutional pressures. In the end, we find greater support for diversification, that is, polymorphism, than concentration in the ways organizations manage their presence on the platform. This has implications for how we understand platform power and integrate institutional theories in communication research.

AB - Through guidelines, terms of service and algorithmic curation, digital platforms such as YouTube encourage creators to produce content that fits with the commercial goals of the platform. Scholars have argued that this pressure to conform might lead to uniformity, or isomorphism, in the ways organizations manage their presence on platforms. This article contributes to the debate on isomorphism by taking a bottom-up approach and ask to which extent creators on YouTube pursue similar, or different, strategies for uploading and monetizing content. Through quantitative and qualitative analyses of a sample of YouTube channels, we show how content creators adapt to, negotiate with, and defy institutional pressures. In the end, we find greater support for diversification, that is, polymorphism, than concentration in the ways organizations manage their presence on the platform. This has implications for how we understand platform power and integrate institutional theories in communication research.

U2 - 10.1177/15274764221110198

DO - 10.1177/15274764221110198

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 432

EP - 451

JO - Television and New Media

JF - Television and New Media

SN - 1527-4764

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 315270466