Mette Bengtsson
Associate Professor
Department of Communication
Karen Blixens Plads 8
2300 København S
ORCID: 0000-0002-0019-9182
51 - 54 out of 54Page size: 10
- Published
The Second Persona in Political Commentary
Bengtsson, Mette, 2023, Rhetorical Argumentation: The Copenhagen School. Kock, C. & Lantz, M. (eds.). Windsor, ON: Windsor Studies in Argumentation, Vol. 13. p. 306-332 27 p.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Think-Aloud Reading: Selected Audiences’ Concurrent Reaction to the Implied Audience in Political Commentary
Bengtsson, Mette, 2018, Rhetorical Audience Studies and Reception of Rhetoric: Exploring Audiences Empirically. Kjeldsen, J. E. (ed.). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 161-183Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
- Published
Tænkehøjt-læsning
Hoff-Clausen, Elisabeth & Bengtsson, Mette, 1 Sep 2020, Retorik og metode. Iversen, S., Berg, K. M. & Bengtsson, M. (eds.). Samfundslitteratur, p. 93-113 20 p.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Valgtalen
Bengtsson, Mette & Just, S. N., 2020, Danske taler: 20 opbyggelige analyser. Lund, M. (ed.). Aarhus Universitetsforlag, p. 193-207 (Nordisk Sprog, Litteratur og Medier ; No. 2).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
ID: 5271464
Most downloads
-
4462
downloads
For borgeren, tilskueren eller den indviede? En praksisorienteret retorisk kritik af avisens politiske kommentarer
Research output: Book/Report › Ph.D. thesis › Research
Published -
860
downloads
Approaches to Political Commentary in Scandinavia: A Call for Textual, Evaluating Scholarship
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Published -
52
downloads
Et retorisk perspektiv på faktatjek: Om etablering og brug af fakta i politisk debat
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review