The academic rat race: dilemmas and problems in the structure of academic competition

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Standard

The academic rat race : dilemmas and problems in the structure of academic competition. / Landes, Xavier; Andersen, Martin Marchman; Nielsen, Morten Ebbe Juul.

In: Learning and Teaching: The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2012, p. 73-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Landes, X, Andersen, MM & Nielsen, MEJ 2012, 'The academic rat race: dilemmas and problems in the structure of academic competition', Learning and Teaching: The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 73-90. https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2012.050205

APA

Landes, X., Andersen, M. M., & Nielsen, M. E. J. (2012). The academic rat race: dilemmas and problems in the structure of academic competition. Learning and Teaching: The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences, 5(2), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2012.050205

Vancouver

Landes X, Andersen MM, Nielsen MEJ. The academic rat race: dilemmas and problems in the structure of academic competition. Learning and Teaching: The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences. 2012;5(2):73-90. https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2012.050205

Author

Landes, Xavier ; Andersen, Martin Marchman ; Nielsen, Morten Ebbe Juul. / The academic rat race : dilemmas and problems in the structure of academic competition. In: Learning and Teaching: The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences. 2012 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 73-90.

Bibtex

@article{13f320d6e74f4f609531a77fa07d4616,
title = "The academic rat race: dilemmas and problems in the structure of academic competition",
abstract = "The social benefits expected from academia are generally identified as belonging to three broad categories: research, education and contribution to society in general. However, evaluating the present situation of academia according to these criteria reveals a somewhat disturbing phenomenon: an increased pressure to produce articles (in peer-reviewed journals) has created an unbalanced emphasis on the research criterion at the expense of the latter two. More fatally, this pressure has turned academia into a rat race, leading to a deep change in the fundamental structure of academic behaviour, and entailing a self-defeating and hence counter-productive pattern, where more publications is always better and where it becomes increasingly difficult for researchers to keep up with the new research in their field. The article identifies the pressure to publish as a problem of collective action. It ends up by raising questions about how to break this vicious circle and restore a better balance between all three of the social benefits of academia.",
author = "Xavier Landes and Andersen, {Martin Marchman} and Nielsen, {Morten Ebbe Juul}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.3167/latiss.2012.050205",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "73--90",
journal = "Learning and Teaching",
issn = "1755-2273",
publisher = "Berghahn Books Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The academic rat race

T2 - dilemmas and problems in the structure of academic competition

AU - Landes, Xavier

AU - Andersen, Martin Marchman

AU - Nielsen, Morten Ebbe Juul

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The social benefits expected from academia are generally identified as belonging to three broad categories: research, education and contribution to society in general. However, evaluating the present situation of academia according to these criteria reveals a somewhat disturbing phenomenon: an increased pressure to produce articles (in peer-reviewed journals) has created an unbalanced emphasis on the research criterion at the expense of the latter two. More fatally, this pressure has turned academia into a rat race, leading to a deep change in the fundamental structure of academic behaviour, and entailing a self-defeating and hence counter-productive pattern, where more publications is always better and where it becomes increasingly difficult for researchers to keep up with the new research in their field. The article identifies the pressure to publish as a problem of collective action. It ends up by raising questions about how to break this vicious circle and restore a better balance between all three of the social benefits of academia.

AB - The social benefits expected from academia are generally identified as belonging to three broad categories: research, education and contribution to society in general. However, evaluating the present situation of academia according to these criteria reveals a somewhat disturbing phenomenon: an increased pressure to produce articles (in peer-reviewed journals) has created an unbalanced emphasis on the research criterion at the expense of the latter two. More fatally, this pressure has turned academia into a rat race, leading to a deep change in the fundamental structure of academic behaviour, and entailing a self-defeating and hence counter-productive pattern, where more publications is always better and where it becomes increasingly difficult for researchers to keep up with the new research in their field. The article identifies the pressure to publish as a problem of collective action. It ends up by raising questions about how to break this vicious circle and restore a better balance between all three of the social benefits of academia.

U2 - 10.3167/latiss.2012.050205

DO - 10.3167/latiss.2012.050205

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 73

EP - 90

JO - Learning and Teaching

JF - Learning and Teaching

SN - 1755-2273

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 46409527