Evaluating the role of web-based tutorials in educational practice: using interpretative repertoires an meaning negotiation in a two step analysis
Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Research › peer-review
Standard
Evaluating the role of web-based tutorials in educational practice : using interpretative repertoires an meaning negotiation in a two step analysis. / Moring, Camilla; Schreiber, Trine.
2012. Paper presented at LIDA 2012 (Libraries in the Digital Age), Zadar, Croatia.Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CONF
T1 - Evaluating the role of web-based tutorials in educational practice
AU - Moring, Camilla
AU - Schreiber, Trine
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - The paper describes and discusses a two step analysis for evaluating web based information literacy tutorials in educational practice. In a recent evaluation project the authors used the analysis to examine three web based tutorials developed by three different academic libraries in Norway. Firstly, each web-based tutorial is analyzed as a communicative act by looking at how it argues for its purpose, how it is rhetorically organized and the interpretative repertoires used. Secondly, the tutorial is analyzed as a tool that users form opinions about while using it, and therefore the second part of the analysis focuses on user reception and meaning negotiation. In combination the two different analyses strengthen the evaluation of how web-tutorials as communicative acts become meaningful to users, and how this meaning is negotiated in relation to an educational practice. This approach can be recommended as complementary to more traditional usability tests.
AB - The paper describes and discusses a two step analysis for evaluating web based information literacy tutorials in educational practice. In a recent evaluation project the authors used the analysis to examine three web based tutorials developed by three different academic libraries in Norway. Firstly, each web-based tutorial is analyzed as a communicative act by looking at how it argues for its purpose, how it is rhetorically organized and the interpretative repertoires used. Secondly, the tutorial is analyzed as a tool that users form opinions about while using it, and therefore the second part of the analysis focuses on user reception and meaning negotiation. In combination the two different analyses strengthen the evaluation of how web-tutorials as communicative acts become meaningful to users, and how this meaning is negotiated in relation to an educational practice. This approach can be recommended as complementary to more traditional usability tests.
M3 - Paper
Y2 - 18 June 2012 through 22 June 2012
ER -
ID: 47058951