Does automatic funding suck? The cost and value of automatic funding in small nation screen industries in Northern Europe

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Does automatic funding suck? The cost and value of automatic funding in small nation screen industries in Northern Europe. / Sørensen, Inge Ejbye; Redvall, Eva Novrup.

In: International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol. 27, No. 3, 06.04.2020, p. 298-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Sørensen, IE & Redvall, EN 2020, 'Does automatic funding suck? The cost and value of automatic funding in small nation screen industries in Northern Europe', International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 298-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2020.1724107

APA

Sørensen, I. E., & Redvall, E. N. (2020). Does automatic funding suck? The cost and value of automatic funding in small nation screen industries in Northern Europe. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 27(3), 298-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2020.1724107

Vancouver

Sørensen IE, Redvall EN. Does automatic funding suck? The cost and value of automatic funding in small nation screen industries in Northern Europe. International Journal of Cultural Policy. 2020 Apr 6;27(3):298-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2020.1724107

Author

Sørensen, Inge Ejbye ; Redvall, Eva Novrup. / Does automatic funding suck? The cost and value of automatic funding in small nation screen industries in Northern Europe. In: International Journal of Cultural Policy. 2020 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 298-311.

Bibtex

@article{79f8b30be138422b9c1d6455025d2728,
title = "Does automatic funding suck?: The cost and value of automatic funding in small nation screen industries in Northern Europe",
abstract = "Recent years have seen a rise in automatic funding schemes in the screen industries. This article examines the intended and unintended consequences of automatic incentives in smaller screen economies in Northern Europe. It focuses on the Danish Film Institute{\textquoteright}s decision to abolish automatic schemes including tax incentives, and compares this case to other screen industries where automatic funding is well established or has been recently introduced. Based on discussions with executives and funders at national screen agencies, the article investigates who benefits from specific funding schemes and which screen industry automatic incentives prioritise and facilitate. Through this, it examines the political considerations and value systems that underpin funding priorities, and the perception of automatic funding among policy makers, implementers and stakeholders in national screen industries. The analysis indicates that automatic funding is rarely a proactive measure, but rather a response to failing screen industries or competition from neighbouring funding incentives.",
author = "S{\o}rensen, {Inge Ejbye} and Redvall, {Eva Novrup}",
year = "2020",
month = apr,
day = "6",
doi = "10.1080/10286632.2020.1724107",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "298--311",
journal = "International Journal of Cultural Policy",
issn = "1028-6632",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does automatic funding suck?

T2 - The cost and value of automatic funding in small nation screen industries in Northern Europe

AU - Sørensen, Inge Ejbye

AU - Redvall, Eva Novrup

PY - 2020/4/6

Y1 - 2020/4/6

N2 - Recent years have seen a rise in automatic funding schemes in the screen industries. This article examines the intended and unintended consequences of automatic incentives in smaller screen economies in Northern Europe. It focuses on the Danish Film Institute’s decision to abolish automatic schemes including tax incentives, and compares this case to other screen industries where automatic funding is well established or has been recently introduced. Based on discussions with executives and funders at national screen agencies, the article investigates who benefits from specific funding schemes and which screen industry automatic incentives prioritise and facilitate. Through this, it examines the political considerations and value systems that underpin funding priorities, and the perception of automatic funding among policy makers, implementers and stakeholders in national screen industries. The analysis indicates that automatic funding is rarely a proactive measure, but rather a response to failing screen industries or competition from neighbouring funding incentives.

AB - Recent years have seen a rise in automatic funding schemes in the screen industries. This article examines the intended and unintended consequences of automatic incentives in smaller screen economies in Northern Europe. It focuses on the Danish Film Institute’s decision to abolish automatic schemes including tax incentives, and compares this case to other screen industries where automatic funding is well established or has been recently introduced. Based on discussions with executives and funders at national screen agencies, the article investigates who benefits from specific funding schemes and which screen industry automatic incentives prioritise and facilitate. Through this, it examines the political considerations and value systems that underpin funding priorities, and the perception of automatic funding among policy makers, implementers and stakeholders in national screen industries. The analysis indicates that automatic funding is rarely a proactive measure, but rather a response to failing screen industries or competition from neighbouring funding incentives.

U2 - 10.1080/10286632.2020.1724107

DO - 10.1080/10286632.2020.1724107

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27

SP - 298

EP - 311

JO - International Journal of Cultural Policy

JF - International Journal of Cultural Policy

SN - 1028-6632

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 229811760