Diagnosing, special education and ‘learnification’ in Danish schools

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Diagnosing, special education and ‘learnification’ in Danish schools. / Hamre, Bjørn.

In: Nordic Journal of Social Research, Vol. 7, No. Special issue, 5, 2016, p. 65-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hamre, B 2016, 'Diagnosing, special education and ‘learnification’ in Danish schools', Nordic Journal of Social Research, vol. 7, no. Special issue, 5, pp. 65-76. <https://boap.uib.no/index.php/njsr>

APA

Hamre, B. (2016). Diagnosing, special education and ‘learnification’ in Danish schools. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 7(Special issue), 65-76. [5]. https://boap.uib.no/index.php/njsr

Vancouver

Hamre B. Diagnosing, special education and ‘learnification’ in Danish schools. Nordic Journal of Social Research. 2016;7(Special issue):65-76. 5.

Author

Hamre, Bjørn. / Diagnosing, special education and ‘learnification’ in Danish schools. In: Nordic Journal of Social Research. 2016 ; Vol. 7, No. Special issue. pp. 65-76.

Bibtex

@article{846e209749834a64bc33393703d71232,
title = "Diagnosing, special education and {\textquoteleft}learnification{\textquoteright} in Danish schools",
abstract = "This article focuses on a discussion of diagnosing, special education, and {\textquoteleft}learnification{\textquoteright} in a Danish school context in which the increasing use of diagnosis is analysed as resulting from the ideas of normality that are associated with the construction of the pupil as a learner. I argue that diagnosis in schools can be seen as the shadow side of the articulation and management of learning through schools{\textquoteright} requirements for pupils. This article is based on my analysis of files produced by educational psychologists. Learning and diagnosis, I argue, constitute two different, but parallel, ways of looking at being a pupil in school, each of which represents conceptions of deviance and normality. The article{\textquoteright}s methodological point of departure draws on a Foucauldian-influenced analysis of diagnosing and learning in education.",
author = "Bj{\o}rn Hamre",
note = "Special issue: Special education and the deviant child in the Nordic countries – the impact of Foucault",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "65--76",
journal = "Nordic Journal of Social Research",
issn = "1892-2783",
publisher = "Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences",
number = "Special issue",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosing, special education and ‘learnification’ in Danish schools

AU - Hamre, Bjørn

N1 - Special issue: Special education and the deviant child in the Nordic countries – the impact of Foucault

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This article focuses on a discussion of diagnosing, special education, and ‘learnification’ in a Danish school context in which the increasing use of diagnosis is analysed as resulting from the ideas of normality that are associated with the construction of the pupil as a learner. I argue that diagnosis in schools can be seen as the shadow side of the articulation and management of learning through schools’ requirements for pupils. This article is based on my analysis of files produced by educational psychologists. Learning and diagnosis, I argue, constitute two different, but parallel, ways of looking at being a pupil in school, each of which represents conceptions of deviance and normality. The article’s methodological point of departure draws on a Foucauldian-influenced analysis of diagnosing and learning in education.

AB - This article focuses on a discussion of diagnosing, special education, and ‘learnification’ in a Danish school context in which the increasing use of diagnosis is analysed as resulting from the ideas of normality that are associated with the construction of the pupil as a learner. I argue that diagnosis in schools can be seen as the shadow side of the articulation and management of learning through schools’ requirements for pupils. This article is based on my analysis of files produced by educational psychologists. Learning and diagnosis, I argue, constitute two different, but parallel, ways of looking at being a pupil in school, each of which represents conceptions of deviance and normality. The article’s methodological point of departure draws on a Foucauldian-influenced analysis of diagnosing and learning in education.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 65

EP - 76

JO - Nordic Journal of Social Research

JF - Nordic Journal of Social Research

SN - 1892-2783

IS - Special issue

M1 - 5

ER -

ID: 180608242